Solana Co-Founder Prefers ‘No Reserve’ Despite SOL’s Inclusion

Solana Boss Prefers No Crypto Reserve, Even with SOL Included

The world of cryptocurrency is buzzing with talks about a possible US crypto reserve. This idea is like the government keeping a special collection of cryptocurrencies, similar to how countries keep gold. But not everyone thinks this is a good idea. Anatoly Yakovenko, the boss of Solana, says he prefers no US crypto reserve, even though Solana (SOL) is on the list[1][3]. Let’s find out why he thinks this way and what it means for the future of cryptocurrencies.

Why Centralization is a Problem

Yakovenko’s main worry is something called centralization. He thinks that if the government controls a crypto reserve, it could ruin the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies[1][3]. Decentralization means that no one person or group is in charge. Transactions can happen without banks or governments being involved. But if the government is in charge of a crypto reserve, there’s a risk that this decentralization could fail, as Yakovenko puts it[1].

What’s the Alternative?

Even though Yakovenko would prefer no reserve at all, he also suggests another idea. He thinks it might be better if states were in charge of their own crypto reserves. This could help protect against mistakes made by the Federal Reserve[1][3]. By having states manage their own reserves, it might make things safer.

Clear Rules for Inclusion

Another important thing Yakovenko says is that there should be clear, measurable rules for which tokens can be in a national reserve. He thinks these rules should be fair and make sense. Right now, only Bitcoin might meet these standards, but the rules should be “rationally justified”[1][3]. This way, only tokens that deserve to be in a reserve are included, not just because of politics or guesswork.

What’s Going On?

On March 2, US President Donald Trump said he wants to include several cryptocurrencies in a special reserve. This includes Solana (SOL), XRP, Cardano (ADA), Bitcoin (BTC), and Ether (ETH)[1][3]. Some people think this is a good step towards cryptocurrencies being more accepted. Others worry about what it means if the government gets involved.

What’s Next?

In the end, the talk about a US crypto reserve shows how tricky it is to balance government rules with the idea of decentralized cryptocurrencies. Yakovenko’s thoughts show that many people in the crypto world are worried about keeping the good parts of blockchain technology. As we figure out what the future holds, it’s important to think about the good and bad sides of the government being involved with cryptocurrency reserves.

—

Sources:
– TradingView
– Cointelegraph
– CoinTime